What is a consideration when choosing indirect suppression tactics?

Choosing indirect suppression tactics involves assessing various factors related to effectively managing a wildfire while minimizing risks. The correct answer highlights the potential for more extensive bar burning. When employing indirect suppression methods, firefighters often create fire lines at a certain distance from the fire's edge. This tactic is essential because it allows fires to burn towards the line in a controlled manner, which can utilize natural barriers and reduce the intensity of the fire. However, this tactic also has the consequence of possibly creating more extensive bar burning, which refers to the area burned outside the immediate fire perimeter as flames travel towards the established control lines. Understanding this potential impact is crucial for strategizing in a way that protects both the firefighters and the surrounding environment.

In terms of the other considerations, the location of water sources and the distance from the fire's edge are certainly important for overall suppression tactics, as access to water can facilitate direct attack methods and distance can influence safety. Additionally, the expected time to complete containment informs resource allocation and safety assessments for firefighters engaged in suppression efforts. However, the direct connection of choosing indirect tactics to the consideration of bar burning stands out as it relates specifically to the implications of these tactics on the fire's spread and control outcomes.